jingham added a comment. In D97739#2607993 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D97739#2607993>, @clayborg wrote:
> I agree that we should avoid SBEvent after thinking about it. First off, doing long running operations on a thread that is the one handling the major lldb events is obviously a bad idea. Secondly, there's no reason that the listener for progress events has to call "WaitForEvents" along with all the process events it's waiting for on the debugger. You could just set up a listener thread for all these events (they would have their own event bit) if you wanted somebody just monitoring progress events. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D97739/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D97739 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
