Author: Jim Ingham
Date: 2021-07-27T13:38:09-07:00
New Revision: 69529286ce2dcd90563bca97537ce570c6d115b4

URL: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/69529286ce2dcd90563bca97537ce570c6d115b4
DIFF: 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/69529286ce2dcd90563bca97537ce570c6d115b4.diff

LOG: Add a test for top-level expressions using "expr --top-level".

This was broken for a while even though the Python version
continued to work.  This adds a test so it doesn't regress.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    lldb/test/API/commands/expression/top-level/TestTopLevelExprs.py

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/lldb/test/API/commands/expression/top-level/TestTopLevelExprs.py 
b/lldb/test/API/commands/expression/top-level/TestTopLevelExprs.py
index 92707eabec0ce..220332759ec4d 100644
--- a/lldb/test/API/commands/expression/top-level/TestTopLevelExprs.py
+++ b/lldb/test/API/commands/expression/top-level/TestTopLevelExprs.py
@@ -92,6 +92,12 @@ def test_top_level_expressions(self):
             resultFromCode,
             resultFromTopLevel.GetValueAsUnsigned())
 
+        # Make sure the command line version works as well:
+        self.runCmd("expr --top-level -- int TopLevelFunction() { return 101; 
}")
+        resultFromTopLevel = 
self.frame().EvaluateExpression("TopLevelFunction()")
+        self.assertTrue(resultFromTopLevel.IsValid())
+        self.assertEqual(101, resultFromTopLevel.GetValueAsUnsigned(), 
"Command line version works.")
+
     def test_top_level_expression_without_target(self):
         self.expect("expr --top-level -- void func() {}", error=True,
                     substrs=["Top-level code needs to be inserted into a 
runnable target"])


        
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to