labath added a reviewer: mgorny.
labath added a comment.
+1 for the test. It should be fairly easy to rig up a "gdb-remote client" test
that sends such a packet.
================
Comment at:
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunicationClient.cpp:2909-2917
+ if (!pid_tid) {
+ // if ids is empty, this is an error
+ if (ids.size() == 0)
+ return {};
+ // if ids is not empty, bail out from here and process ids
+ break;
+ }
----------------
clayborg wrote:
> Might be nice to make sure we got LLDB_INVALID_PROCESS_ID back, as it might
> not always be zero?
pid == LLDB_INVALID_PROCESS_ID is a valid response if the stub does not support
the multiprocess syntax. pid == GetPID() is a valid response if it supports it.
IIRC, further validation/interpretation of these values is done in the caller.
================
Comment at:
lldb/source/Plugins/Process/gdb-remote/GDBRemoteCommunicationClient.cpp:2911-2912
+ // if ids is empty, this is an error
+ if (ids.size() == 0)
+ return {};
+ // if ids is not empty, bail out from here and process ids
----------------
Isn't it still possible to get the infinite recursion you mentioned, if the
response consists only of a single comma ?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D109937/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D109937
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
