labath added inline comments.
================
Comment at:
lldb/test/API/functionalities/data-formatter/stringprinter/main.cpp:42-43
+ //% self.expect_var_path("a.data", summary='"FOOB"')
+ // Should this be "FO\0B" instead?
+ //% self.expect_var_path("b.data", summary='"FO"')
}
----------------
This would be consistent with gdb as well, and it was the preferred result of
last years irc straw poll, but it will require a different fix.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D111399/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D111399
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits