dblaikie added a comment. In D112340#3081540 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112340#3081540>, @teemperor wrote:
> In D112340#3081532 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112340#3081532>, @dblaikie > wrote: > >> Sorry I missed this - are these tested anywhere/should I have been able to >> discover if these needed to be changed before I made the change? > > TestCompactVectors tests this but its unfortunately marked as Darwin-only (as > it includes the `Accelerate` framework). Providing a platform-neutral test > that just typedef's the same things as Accelerate (in addition to the test > including the real framework) seems like a good idea. Good to know - will keep it in mind, but don't think I'm up for writing that test right now myself (not especially familiar with lldb test infrastructure, etc). Was this reported by a buildbot, do you think/know of? Probably would've been happy to debug-via-buildbot and fix it that way, but don't recall seeing a fail-mail about this (but as always, there's a fair bit of buildbot noise and sometimes it's hard to find the cause/issue in a fail-mail such that I end up ignoring them) Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112340/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112340 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits