xujuntwt95329 added a comment. In D112439#3102506 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112439#3102506>, @teemperor wrote:
> In D112439#3098307 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D112439#3098307>, @xujuntwt95329 > wrote: > >> Seems that patch can't build by CI because it is based on this patch. In my >> understanding we need to merge this patch firstly and rebase that NFC patch >> to let CI work, right? > > You can set parent/child revisions in Phabricator that should handle this > situation (not sure if the premerge-checks are respecting that, but that's > how Phab usually manages unmerged dependencies). > > But to be clear, the premerge checks on Phabricator are *not* building or > testing LLDB at all. See the CI log: > > INFO projects: {'lldb'} > INFO all excluded projects(*) {'check-cxxabi', 'flang', 'libunwind', > 'compiler-rt', 'cross-project-tests', 'libcxx', 'libcxxabi', 'libc', > 'openmp', 'lldb'} > INFO effective projects list set() Thanks a lot for the detailed information! BTW, I see there are some test failure reported by CI, but I can't reproduce them in my local environment (X86_64 Ubuntu and Windows), is there any docker images to simulate the CI environment? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D112439/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D112439 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
