labath added a comment. It would be nice if the commit message/summary included more details about the differences in signal handling (the things we talked about on irc), but generally, I think this patch looks good.
The only thing that's missing is interoperability with older lldb-compatible stubs (debugservers mainly). I believe we already have some "standard" solution for that, like checking for QThreadSuffixSupported or some similar lldb-only packet (?) CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D108078/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D108078 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
