jasonmolenda marked 5 inline comments as done.
jasonmolenda added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp:7005
+ Log *log(lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet(LIBLLDB_LOG_DYNAMIC_LOADER));
if (image_infos.IsValid()) {
for (const MachOCorefileImageEntry &image : image_infos.all_image_infos) {
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:
> Maybe not for this change but if you made this early return you could dedent
> all the following by one level.
> ```
> if (!image_infos.IsValid())
> return added_images;
> ```
Oh yes, nice.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp:7035
+ image.filename.c_str(), uuidstr.c_str());
+ }
+ for (auto name_vmaddr_tuple : image.segment_load_addresses) {
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:
> You can use the `LLDB_LOGF` to do the `if (log)` for you I think. Then do
> `image.uuid.GetAsString().c_str()` directly as one of the parameters.
Oh that's clever, but I prefer the Printf method so I'll do it this way.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Plugins/ObjectFile/Mach-O/ObjectFileMachO.cpp:7065
+ "ObjectFileMachO::LoadCoreFileImages adding binary '%s' "
+ "UUID %s with slide address 0x%" PRIx64,
+ image.filename.c_str(), uuidstr.c_str(), image.slide);
----------------
DavidSpickett wrote:
> Is the slide address the amount you slide the load address *by* or is it an
> address all to itself? My assumption was the former.
> (which makes the log message a bit odd since it's a distance not an amount)
Yeah, I was banging out these log messages past bedtime trying to wrap it up,
and wasn't as clear as I meant to be. Cleaned these up, thanks.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115494/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D115494
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
