Thanks Pavel, that fix is good.

> On Dec 29, 2021, at 1:05 AM, Pavel Labath via Phabricator 
> <revi...@reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
> 
> labath added a comment.
> 
> The problem was that (without accelerator tables) we would always have more 
> than one cache file for a given module. I have now adjusted the test (daed479 
> <https://reviews.llvm.org/rGdaed4797fee4a5f1985388265f5af209b5cb3b10>) to 
> check for the presence of one _symtab_ index, but other solutions are 
> possible as well. Feel free to change it to something else if you think 
> they're better.
> 
> 
> Repository:
>  rG LLVM Github Monorepo
> 
> CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
>  https://reviews.llvm.org/D115951/new/
> 
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D115951
> 

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to