labath added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/test/Shell/SymbolFile/DWARF/x86/debug_loc.s:28-29
# CHECK: Variable{{.*}}, name = "x0", {{.*}}, scope = parameter, location =
# CHECK-NEXT: [0x0000000000000000, 0x0000000000000001): DW_OP_reg5 RDI
# CHECK-NEXT: [0x0000000000000001, 0x0000000000000006): DW_OP_reg0 RAX
# CHECK: Variable{{.*}}, name = "x1", {{.*}}, scope = parameter
----------------
zequanwu wrote:
> `image dump symfile` already prints valid ranges for variables along with
> where the value is at each range.
Are you sure it does?
I was under the impression that there are two distinct range concepts being
combined here. One is the range list member of the Variable object (as given by
`GetScopeRange` -- that's the one you're printing now), and the other is the
list of ranges hidden in the DWARFExpression object, which come from the
debug_loc(lists) section (that's the one we've been printing so far). And that
the root cause of the confusion is the very existence of these two concepts.
If I got it wrong, then do let me know, cause it would make things a lot
simpler if there is only one validity concept to think about.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119963/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119963
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
