shafik marked 2 inline comments as done.
shafik added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/Value.cpp:667
-const ValueList &ValueList::operator=(const ValueList &rhs) {
+const ValueList &ValueList::operator=(const ValueList &rhs) { //
NOLINT(modernize-use-equals-default)
m_values = rhs.m_values;
----------------
labath wrote:
> shafik wrote:
> > I have to look into why we return a `const &` here. We do this in a few
> > other places too.
> I don't think there's a good reason for that. Most people aren't aware that
> built-in assignment operators return lvalues. And some of the people who are
> aware of that think that it's a bad idea, so they make sure their operators
> don't do it...
It produced build errors, so some of the users are relying on this. I didn't
want to plumb into this since it was orthogonal to the change.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Host/macosx/cfcpp/CFCMutableArray.cpp:18
CFCMutableArray::CFCMutableArray(const CFCMutableArray &rhs)
- : CFCReleaser<CFMutableArrayRef>(rhs) // NOTE: this won't make a copy of
the
+ : CFCReleaser<CFMutableArrayRef>(rhs) //
NOLINT(modernize-use-equals-default)
+ // NOTE: this won't make a copy of
the
----------------
labath wrote:
> Why suppress this?
I wanted to preserve the comment since someone thought it was important.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121844/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121844
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
