JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Target/Platform.cpp:1252
+ if (selected_platform_sp) {
+ if (selected_platform_sp->IsCompatibleArchitecture(
+ arch, process_host_arch, false, nullptr)) {
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> jingham wrote:
> > jingham wrote:
> > > Why are you passing process_host_arch here? This is the
> > > "selected_platform" so you have no way of knowing a priori that this is
> > > the host platform or has the same architecture as the host system. In
> > > the old version, this selected platform part of the processing passed {}
> > > instead of the process_host_arch, which seems more correct.
> > Note, the old code made what seems like the opposite mistake, and DIDN'T
> > pass process_host_arch in the Host Platform section of the code.
> The `process_host_arch` argument was added to
> `Platform::IsCompatibleArchitecture` for
> https://reviews.llvm.org/rGc22c7a61b6d9c90d5d4292205c63cd576f4fd05b. You're
> correct that we don't have a process host arch from where this function is
> being called. So I could have omitted it, but I decided not to for
> consistency with `Platform::GetPlatformForArchitecture` just above.
The new code in TargetList.cpp:179 still passes `{}` to
GetPlatformForArchitectures as the process host arch.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122684/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122684
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
