JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Utility/ArchSpec.cpp:1399
bool ArchSpec::IsFullySpecifiedTriple() const {
- const auto &user_specified_triple = GetTriple();
-
- bool user_triple_fully_specified = false;
-
- if ((user_specified_triple.getOS() != llvm::Triple::UnknownOS) ||
- TripleOSWasSpecified()) {
- if ((user_specified_triple.getVendor() != llvm::Triple::UnknownVendor) ||
- TripleVendorWasSpecified()) {
- const unsigned unspecified = 0;
- if (!user_specified_triple.isOSDarwin() ||
- user_specified_triple.getOSMajorVersion() != unspecified) {
- user_triple_fully_specified = true;
- }
- }
- }
+ if (!TripleOSWasSpecified())
+ return false;
----------------
aprantl wrote:
> JDevlieghere wrote:
> > Are you sure that `TripleOSWasSpecified() == user_specified_triple.getOS()
> > != llvm::Triple::UnknownOS`. Was the check in the original code redundant?
> > Looking at the implementation
> >
> > ```
> > bool TripleOSWasSpecified() const { return !m_triple.getOSName().empty(); }
> > ```
> >
> > I guess this is identical? But when dealing with triples it's probably
> > worth double checking.
> Great question, yes I checked that. The code for both
>
> https://llvm.org/doxygen/Triple_8cpp_source.html#l00524
>
> is a StringSwitch that uses Unknown as the Default case.
>
>
Thanks for checking!
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122912/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D122912
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
