llunak added a comment. In D122974#3483203 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122974#3483203>, @clayborg wrote:
> If the string pool caches the hash value, we could actually write out the > hash in the cache file to speed up loading. The patch doing that is D124704 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D124704> (except for the string pool caching). > I didn't want to re-hash every string when I saved the strings out to the > cache file due to the cost, but it would be interesting to look into to see > if it improves performance. I can measure 10% startup time saved when everything is already cached. Funnily enough, profiler consistently claims that saving caches got faster too (I already use D122975 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D122975>). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D122974/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D122974 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
