JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/DataFileCache.cpp:23-39
// Prune the cache based off of the LLDB settings each time we create a cache
// object.
ModuleListProperties &properties =
ModuleList::GetGlobalModuleListProperties();
llvm::CachePruningPolicy policy;
// Only scan once an hour. If we have lots of debug sessions we don't want
// to scan this directory too often. A timestamp file is written to the
----------------
Would it make sense to extract this into a static function say
`DefaultCachePruningPolicy` and then have one constructor with an optional
policy argument? Something like this:
```
DataFileCache(llvm::StringRef path, llvm::CachePruningPolicy policy =
DataFileCache::DefaultCachePruningPolicy);
```
In addition to having only one constructor, the new function also provides a
natural place to document the policy.
================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/DataFileCache.cpp:40
std::chrono::hours(properties.GetLLDBIndexCacheExpirationDays() * 24);
pruneCache(path, policy);
+ DataFileCache(path, policy);
----------------
Is it intentional that we now call this twice?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131531/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D131531
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
