JDevlieghere added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lldb/docs/resources/fuzzing.rst:28-33 +To build a fuzzer, run the desired ninja command for the fuzzer(s) you want to build: + +:: + $ ninja lldb-target-fuzzer + $ ninja lldb-commandinterpreter-fuzzer + $ ninja lldb-expression-fuzzer ---------------- mib wrote: > Don't we have a top-level `ninja lldb-fuzzer` command that runs all the > fuzzer ? If not, what about adding that ? Building all the fuzzers (`lldb-fuzzer(s)`) or running all the fuzzers (`fuzz-lldb`)? Personally +1 having a target that builds all the fuzzers. I'm not sure if I would ever want to run all the fuzzers in parallel, but I'm also not opposed to the idea as it would be similar to what `check-lldb` does. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D132148/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D132148 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
