labath added a comment. In D134493#3810290 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D134493#3810290>, @Michael137 wrote:
> Wasn't sure how to properly test this since the original reproducer > technically relies on implementation-defined behaviour (i.e., initialising a > bitfield with an out-of-range value). Suggestions are welcome I'm probably missing something, but what exactly is undefined about that test program? The number eight fits comfortably in four bits, and afaik it is a valid value for the `EnumVals` type because it has a fixed underlying type. Other than that, this seems fine to me. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D134493/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D134493 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
