labath added a comment. I have a somewhat high level question. Do we actually want (SB)Type::IsTypeComplete to return true for these kinds of types?
For clang's benefit, we have to pretend that the AST objects are complete (and empty), but we're not similarly restricted in our own representations of those types, so we could theoretically just answer `false` here (and possibly have some additional method to indicate that the type is strange in some way). Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D138259/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D138259 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
