bulbazord added a comment. In D149625#4312838 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D149625#4312838>, @jingham wrote:
> The old code had the side-effect of NOT resolving the path of the SBFileSpec > in order to get its directory. I am not sure whether that was on purpose or > not, however. To be more precise, the old code had the side-effect of guaranteeing that whatever path was given to you was from an unresolved FileSpec. Right now, if the SBFileSpec is unresolved, this will do the exact same thing as before. With this change, if an SBFileSpec is resolved, the path you're getting is from a resolved FileSpec. I'm pretty sure that this shouldn't actually be different than what was there before since we're making a copy from the underlying FileSpec though, unless I'm missing something? Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D149625/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D149625 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
