kastiglione added inline comments.

================
Comment at: lldb/include/lldb/Core/ValueObject.h:483
   // this will always create the children if necessary
-  lldb::ValueObjectSP GetChildAtNamePath(llvm::ArrayRef<ConstString> names,
-                                         ConstString *name_of_error = nullptr);
+  lldb::ValueObjectSP GetChildAtNamePath(llvm::ArrayRef<llvm::StringRef> 
names);
 
----------------
Michael137 wrote:
> Guessing removing the parameter is fine because no callers were actually 
> passing it?
I forgot I had made this change too. Correct, no callers were using this, so I 
removed it. I can imagine there could be a hypothetical case that uses it to 
determine a fallback action, but none do and it seems unlikely.


================
Comment at: lldb/source/Core/ValueObject.cpp:434
   ValueObjectSP root(GetSP());
-  for (ConstString name : names) {
+  for (auto name : names) {
     root = root->GetChildMemberWithName(name, true);
----------------
JDevlieghere wrote:
> I don’t think this qualifies for ‘auto’ according to the LLVM coding 
> guidelines.
I find the guidelines to be not specific enough. Case in point, this section 
shows `auto` being used in range for loops: 
https://llvm.org/docs/CodingStandards.html#beware-unnecessary-copies-with-auto


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D151813/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D151813

_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to