dblaikie added a comment. Really appreciate you providing this prototype.
> This solves one of the current weaknesses in DWARF debugging, which is the > inability to set breakpoints or step onto inlined callsites. However, there > are other proposals (such as Location View Numbering) that could achieve the > same thing, and the costs of TLLT in storage size and design complexity may > make it a non-ideal solution to this problem. FWIW, one of the major motivations for this was not only to include the stop points, but also to allow symbolizing including stack frames - so you'd need to know that all the inlined instructions come from the inlined call site. I think, maybe, my vague understanding of Location View Numbering wouldn't cover that case, and only covers the "how do I describe the variable when I'm stopped at this synthetic location that exists just before or after the call", for instance? It is unfortunate to hear that TLLT are a significant size increase, though not entirely surprising - it's a bunch of extra info to encode. I'll be glad to have this example to experiment with. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D152708/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D152708 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
