jimingham wrote:
The idea seems good. If you are looking for a type and you know it is defined
inside another type, then providing a way for you to tell lldb that is useful.
Is FindNestedType guaranteed to have a single return? What if I had:
class A {
class B {
class D {
};
};
class E {
class D {
};
};
};
Then I would expect
```
class_a_type = lldb.target.FindFirstType("A")
class_a_type.FindNestedType("D")
```
to return both A::B::D and A::E::D. So you might need to return a SBTypeList
here? You could also add a `FindFirstWhatever` API to return the first hit in
case there may be many, though whenever I use that in anything but interactive
SB API uses I feel like I probably should be being more careful, so I'm of two
minds about that...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/68705
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
