adrian-prantl wrote: > > doesn't appear to be anything that calls these methods > > Candidate for removal then? If so it still makes sense to fix them, then > remove them. Saves fixing them again if they are brought back. > > Either way, I'm not going to block this by requiring a test case.
I think that makes sense. @PortalPete why don't you land this without a test and then create a PR to remove the unused methods? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74413 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
