clayborg wrote:

> Sorry, it's been a while since I last reviewed this and I must admit I forgot 
> about this in the mean time. The only thing I'd like to check before we can 
> land this is to hear from @Michael137 who has been actively working on 
> FindTypes performance recently whether this aligns or clashes with what he's 
> been working on so we don't get a mid-air collision between patches.

Sounds good, I look forward to hearing if this fixes the issues as well. Before 
this fix I ran a case where I did an expression like "MyClass::iterator" and 
before this fix, with linux and no accelerator tables, we would convert DWARF 
into clang AST types for over 2 million types, and after this fix it went down 
to 11.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/74786
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to