================
@@ -66,3 +67,41 @@ void Progress::ReportProgress() {
m_debugger_id);
}
}
+
+ProgressManager &ProgressManager::InstanceImpl() {
+ static std::once_flag g_once_flag;
+ static ProgressManager *g_progress_manager = nullptr;
+ std::call_once(g_once_flag, []() {
+ // NOTE: known leak to avoid global destructor chain issues.
+ g_progress_manager = new ProgressManager();
+ });
+ return *g_progress_manager;
+}
----------------
chelcassanova wrote:
I was actually going to ask if `Instance()` was still necessary given that all
functionality was in `InstanceImpl()` (or if `InstanceImpl()` now needed to be
public or something along those lines). If we're going to keep the
implementation of the instance accessor this way then to my understanding we
can inline `Instance()`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81319
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
