labath wrote: > Yes, originally lldb's unwinder was recursive for any register propagation > and it was easy to hit the problem of lldb blowing out its own stack on a > recursive inferior that had crashed. I changed most of the propagation to a > loop to solve this (years and years ago) but it looks like we still have a > case where it is recursing. > > We still need to skip the test case on macOS until I can come up with some > idea to get proper unwind instruction for sigtramp on arm64. Most of the CI > bots are x86_64 so it may pass on them, but that's The Past and I would > prefer to skip this on Darwin until I can figure something out, I wrote a > little TODO on myself in rdar://128031075
Sounds good (I meant to xfail this on darwin, but it looks like I forgot). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92503 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
