Greg Clayton <[email protected]> writes:
> Ah! Keep sending us the patches then and we will apply them!

Many thanks!

While I have your ear:

I am testing a patch that adds support for 64 bit elf reading and am
curious about coding conventions.  Are there plans for the LLDB code
base to move towards the coding style used by LLVM/Clang?  There is a
mail in the archives that suggests this may be the case.  In particular,
should new files adopt the LLVM style or maintain consistency with the
rest of LLDB?

Also, will any of the lldb devs consider joining in on #llvm?

Thanks!
Steve


>
> Greg Clayton
>
> On Jul 6, 2010, at 9:42 AM, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>
>> Hi Greg,
>> 
>> Greg Clayton <[email protected]> writes:
>> 
>>> For simple patches like this one, feel free to go ahead and just commit 
>>> them!
>> 
>> I would if I had commit access!   This is the first patch I have sent to
>> an LLVM related project.
>> 
>> 
>> Take care,
>> Steve
>> 
>>> 
>>> Greg Clayton
>>> 
>>> On Jul 2, 2010, at 8:38 PM, Stephen Wilson wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all,
>>>> 
>>>> My hope is to help with the linux port.  Initially I would like to clean
>>>> up many of the compiler warnings I am seeing as a way to familiarize
>>>> myself with the basic code layout.   Attached patch fixes a ctor
>>>> initialization order warning.
>>>> 
>>>> I am seeing many warnings, largely trivial.  Am I correct in assuming
>>>> small patches like this one (file-by-file basis) are preferred?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Steve
>>>> 
>>>> diff --git a/source/Symbol/LineEntry.cpp b/source/Symbol/LineEntry.cpp
>>>> index fb362b9..83c50f2 100644
>>>> --- a/source/Symbol/LineEntry.cpp
>>>> +++ b/source/Symbol/LineEntry.cpp
>>>> @@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ LineEntry::LineEntry() :
>>>>    column(0),
>>>>    is_start_of_statement(0),
>>>>    is_start_of_basic_block(0),
>>>> -    is_terminal_entry(0),
>>>>    is_prologue_end(0),
>>>> -    is_epilogue_begin(0)
>>>> +    is_epilogue_begin(0),
>>>> +    is_terminal_entry(0)
>>>> {
>>>> }
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> lldb-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to