OK, thanks. I think I may have some more patches soon. Regards,
Filipe On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 11:28, Johnny Chen <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Filipe, > > Thanks for the patches. The ifdef and uninitialized patches have been > applied. > As to the get-first-thread patch, we're considering to modify the > GetSelectedThread() method impl > so that it returns the 0th thread if there is no selected thread. > > Thanks again! > Johnny > > On Aug 24, 2011, at 6:23 PM, Filipe Cabecinhas wrote: > > Hi, > > I sent some small fixes to the list, but I don't know if anyone saw them, > since they got mixed with some questions I had. > > One fixes debug code that usually gets ifdeffed out of compilation. > Another one initializes a uint64_t variable that would get the highest > 32-bits zeroed out when executing a 32-bit target, resulting in possibly > wrong addresses when disassembling code. > The "get-first-thread-if-no-selected-thread" patch > makes CommandObjectThreadStepWithTypeAndScope::Execute behave like what was > told to be the desired behaviour: If there is no selected thread, the first > thread is selected ( > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/lldb-dev/2011-July/000522.html ). > > Regards, > > Filipe > > <fix-ifdeffed-code-stackframelist.patch> > <get-first-thread-if-no-selected-thread.patch><uninitialized-uint64.patch> > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
