This looks fine. Jim
On Oct 24, 2011, at 3:27 AM, Enrico Granata wrote: > Hi all, > attached to this email is an update for the patch that refactors the current > implementation of locking in ScriptInterpreterPython. > This update merges the previous version with Benjamin Kramer's refactoring. > Other than that, it is the same as the previous version. > > Thanks for any feedback on this. > > - Enrico Granata > > On Oct 20, 2011, at 6:26 PM, Enrico Granata wrote: > >> Hi all, >> attached to this email is a patch that refactors the current implementation >> of locking in ScriptInterpreterPython. >> Essentially, it improves on the existing Locker class to make it feasible >> for use everywhere a lock on the Python interpreter is required, and makes >> several code changes in ScriptInterpreterPython to use Locker instances >> instead of replicating code for acquiring and releasing said lock. >> This should improve maintainability and readability of code in >> ScriptInterpreterPython, while keeping the external behavior of the class >> consistent (several runs of the test suite have shown no issues). > > <pylock.diff> > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
