Hi, I had a small extension that implemented this command (of course it comes with lots of problems in the presence of highly optimized code). I can update the patches and submit them for review.
Regards, Filipe On Monday, May 28, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > Le 27 mai 2012 à 19:06, Greg Clayton a écrit : > > > > > On May 27, 2012, at 5:28 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > > > > > > > Le 26 mai 2012 à 19:25, Greg Clayton a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > On May 26, 2012, at 4:05 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > I'm moving from GDB to LLDB, and while I managed to perform almost > > > > > everything I need with LLDB, I miss one GDB feature. > > > > > > > > > > The return command: > > > > > > > > > > help return > > > > > Make selected stack frame return to its caller. > > > > > Control remains in the debugger, but when you continue > > > > > execution will resume in the frame above the one now selected. > > > > > If an argument is given, it is an expression for the value to return. > > > > > > > > > > Is there some equivalent in LLDB ? > > > > > > > > Unfortunately, no. Feel free to file an enhancement request. > > > > > > Which bug reporter do you recommend for such request ? llvm bug reporter > > > or Apple bug reporter ? > > > > Apple would get the most attention from the LLDB team here at Apple. > > OK. > Filled as rdar://11543846 > > -- Jean-Daniel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
