Could we get a MSVC build bot of the Windows branch too? If this is possible who should I contact?
On Tue, Sep 25, 2012 at 11:30 AM, NAKAMURA Takumi <[email protected]>wrote: > George, as far as I know, > > http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-linux > http://llvm-amd64.freebsd.your.org:8010/builders/lldb-amd64-freebsd > http://llvm-amd64.freebsd.your.org:8010/builders/lldb-i386-freebsd > > ...Takumi > > 2012/9/25 George Russell <[email protected]>: > > Hi, > > > > Are there currently any publically viewable LLDB build-bots that can show > > the build status / test status of LLDB? > > > > Cheers, > > George > > > > > > On 25/09/12 00:23, Sean Callanan wrote: > >> > >> As of revision 164563 (but, as I say below, please check out 164573), > LLDB > >> is back in sync with top-of-tree Clang. > >> > >> This commit has several important implications: > >> – > >> 1. LLDB is no longer tied to a specific Clang revision. LLDB > top-of-tree > >> is intended to build against Clang top-of-tree. That means we have to > fix > >> any build failures quickly, and I'll be keeping track of compatibility > until > >> we get a more permanent solution. > >> 2. We no longer use local patches (scripts/{llvm,clang}.*.diff) of any > >> sort. To ensure LLDB stability, we will make LLDB release branches that > >> will be tied to Clang release branches. > >> 3. We no longer use or commit llvm.zip. If you don't want to have to > >> rebuild Clang, just don't update your local lldb/llvm tree. > >> – > >> Building LLDB on OS X works the same way it did before: open up > >> lldb.xcworkspace and build the LLDB scheme. > >> > >> For your convenience, I have added a new configuration to the > .xcodeproj: > >> DebugClang (available as of revision 164573). Here's the difference > between > >> Debug and DebugClang: > >> > >> - Debug builds a Release+Asserts version of Clang, which is easy on the > >> debug information size, but still appropriately yelps when LLDB abuses > it. > >> - DebugClang builds a Debug+Asserts version of Clang, which contains a > TON > >> of debug information. > >> > >> Unless you are working specifically on the Clang integration, you'll > >> probably prefer Debug. > >> > >> Sean > >> _______________________________________________ > >> lldb-dev mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > -- João Matos
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
