On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Pawel Wodnicki <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Don't think any of the above ASan features are worth mentioning. Perhaps > > cmake support and error reporting. > > > Seems there was quite a bit of development in ASan/TSan and besides > just bug fixes there must some good features worth mentioning > in addition to cmake and error reporting? > > Might be easier if you could just provide short blurb. > I actually don't think we did any significant user-visible improvements in asan other than LOTS of bug/performance/compatibility fixes. asan for OSX and Android did not exist in 3.1 (Alex, right?), so these two platforms could be included into the release notes: Improvements to AddressSanitizer including better portability (OSX, Android NDK), support for cmake based builds, enhanced error reporting and lots of bug fixes. --kcc > > Pawel > > > > On Dec 14, 2012 8:42 AM, "Kostya Serebryany" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> [did this go to lldb-dev on purpose?] > >> > >> Hi Pawel, > >> > >> From these docs: > >>Improvemens to AddressSanitizer< > http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/tools/clang/docs/AddressSanitizer.html> > including: > >> increasing stack size limit to 256M, better portability > >> (iOS6,Windows,Android NDK), support for cmake based builds, enhanced > error > >> reporting. > >> > >> - ThreadSanitizer (TSan)< > http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/tools/clang/docs/ThreadSanitizer.html> - > >> data race detector run-time library for C/C++ has been added. > >> - Improvemens to AddressSanitizer< > http://llvm.org/releases/3.2/tools/clang/docs/AddressSanitizer.html> > including: > >> increasing stack size limit to 256M, better portability > >> (iOS6,Windows,Android NDK), support for cmake based builds, enhanced > error > >> reporting. > >> > >> > >> Both links point to nowhere. > >> AddressSanitizer's support for iOS and Windows is immature to include it > >> into release notes. > >> Did we do the "increasing stack size limit to 256M" bit? > >> > >> --kcc > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2012 at 4:35 AM, Chris Lattner <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >>> The LLVM 3.2 release is wrapping up, and the 3.2 release notes are > being > >>> finalized. There is a section describing improvements in LLVM 3.2 that > >>> could use some help, please take a look when you get a chance: > >>> > >>> > http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/llvm/branches/release_32/docs/ReleaseNotes.html?revision=HEAD#lldb > >>> > >>> I think that improvements in linux support, in particular, may be worth > >>> highlighting along with the other general goodness that has happened > since > >>> LLVM 3.1 branched. Feel free to commit improvements directly to the > >>> release_32 branch, or email Pawel text to include. > >>> > >>> -Chris > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> lldb-dev mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > >>> > >> > >> > > > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
