I will need to take a look at the diffs between the windows branch and top of tree before this can happen. There might be some organizational things that need to be done. If you can make sure the windows branch is completely up to date and ping me with the revision it is synced to on top of tree, I can checkout the diffs and let you know if anything needs to be fixed prior to merging.
Greg On Jan 7, 2013, at 12:48 AM, Carlo Kok <[email protected]> wrote: > Op 19-12-2012 16:10, Malea, Daniel schreef: >> +1 I like the idea of merging the CMake stuff into trunk. The Linux build >> would benefit. >> >> Dan >> >> On 2012-12-19, at 3:26 AM, "Carlo Kok" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> The current status of the Windows branch is that it compiles & runs (quite >>> well) on Windows with VS2010/2012 and uses CMake base build logic. Things >>> that don't work yet: >>> * Debugging with a Windows host (I only need remote debugging) >>> * The "lldb" console has some issues, João Matos abstracted it into >>> separate files >>> >>> However I don't expect any updates on those two issues any time soon, I >>> don't know anything about setting up a debugging host on windows to be able >>> to do something about it. That said, the code works really well as a >>> library, and to avoid bit rotting it would be great if the changes could be >>> merged into trunk. (so far I've upmerged trunk back into it). > > > Looks like this got lost while everyone was on vacation over the holidays. > Anyone got any comment on this? > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
