Great! If you're already working on figuring out the process architecture, I won't bother filing a bug about it.
Cheers, Dan From: Michael Sartain <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Date: Wednesday, 15 May, 2013 2:10 PM To: Daniel Malea <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Michael Sartain <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] PATCH for REVIEW: Implement Linux Host::FindProcesses() On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Malea, Daniel <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: I verified the implementation works as expected on Linux (Ubuntu 12.10), but I notice you're not filling in the process architecture. I believe there's an existing comment about why it's better to determine the arch in a different place, so it's probably fine to omit for now, but unless someone has any qualms, I will file a bug to also list the process' architectures when the user does "platform process list"; currently that field just shows "0". Ha! You are good. I'm actually about halfway through a GetELFProcessCPUType() function right now. It looks like I have to follow the exe link and read the elf header to get that data, but it's not too bad. Chris Lattner was kinda enough to get me commit access, so hopefully I'll have something for folks to review later today and then try to submit it myself if it looks ok. In addition to fixing the platform command bug (functionalities/platform) this patch also fixes the attach-by-name test cases (python_api/hello_world and functionalities/process_attach)! Committed in r181904, tests re-enabled in r181905. Thank you much for checking and getting this in Daniel. Appreciate it. -Mike _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
