On 2013-06-25 2:56 PM, "Greg Clayton" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >I vote to exclude internals and only publish the "lldb/include/API" >headers (lldb::SB*) from top of tree and not worry about versioning, just >always show the latest and greatest. If we only want the SB* classes, the overall size of the C++ reference goes down to 12MB, which makes me feel a lot better :) > >Not sure if we can automatically detect any changes to >lldb/include/API/*.h will cause a SVN server side script to kick off and >regenerate the doxygen headers and check them it automatically? Then you >would always have a current set of documentation locally on your machine >for your checked out LLDB? > I think that makes sense. If I'm not mistaken LLVM docs are updated in a similar fashion, but the HTML is not checked in. Does anyone know who maintains the LLVM docs, or who set them up? They might have some input here.. Dan _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
