That should work. We changed the address compares used in the breakpoint location lists to use Address::ModulePointerAndOffsetLessThanFunctionObject, but that requires the input Addresses be resolved already. That's probably why it stopped working. It should be fine to just resolve the input address in FindLocationIDByAddress before looking it up.
Jim On Jul 15, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Michael Sartain <[email protected]> wrote: > Should the following work? > > m_break_bp_sp = m_process->GetTarget().CreateBreakpoint(break_addr, true); > assert (m_break_bp_sp->FindLocationIDByAddress(break_addr) != > LLDB_INVALID_BREAK_ID); > > The problem I'm running into is that CreateBreakpoint() is resolving the > address: > > 319+> m_section_load_list.ResolveLoadAddress(addr, so_addr); > 320| if (!so_addr.IsValid()) > 321| { > 322| // The address didn't resolve, so just set this as an absolute > address > 323| so_addr.SetOffset (addr); > 324| } > > But FindLocationIDByAddress() isn't, so the address comparisons are failing > in the FindLocationIDByAddress() routine. > -Mike > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
