On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Enrico Granata <[email protected]> wrote: > That makes sense. An std::string only has one child, which is a struct that > then contains the pointer > std::string has no synthetic children, also. > It only has a summary.
Well, we have established that "elements" of a std::list are only called so in a "synthetic" sense. I think characters are elements of a std::string in exactly the same sense, so I think the same API should support accessing both. Moreover, the "summary" has the notion of pretty-printing, and does not seem logically suitable for actual-data access. What do you think of this? _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
