Can we get rid of the "goto" statement and make it a "while(1)" or "for(;;)" like the first part of the fix?
On Jan 24, 2014, at 6:10 AM, Andrew MacPherson <[email protected]> wrote: > Fix a crash where if sem_wait is interrupted then > ProcessMonitor::ServeOperation() will crash accessing an invalid > monitor->m_operation pointer. The fix is taken from how this same case is > already handled in the ProcessMonitor constructor. > > Thanks, > Andrew > <sem_wait.EINTR.Linux.patch>_______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
