Now for hopefully the final netiquette questions: 1. Since I’m not a committer, is posting patches to -commits sufficient? If I get a “looks good to me” reply, do I need to do anything else?
2. When replying, should I cc the author(s), or is posting to the list sufficient? Thanks again, Kuba On Mar 12, 2014, at 11:31 AM, Todd Fiala <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't think anybody would be offended if you pinged, but if you haven't > seen anything in two or three days, that seems fair to ping again. > > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 8:27 AM, Kuba Ober <[email protected]> wrote: > What’s, the, um, customary waiting period before I should somehow “ping” > about the patch > languishing (should it do so - it’s only been a day so far, so I’m not > worried)? > > Thanks, Kuba > > On Mar 12, 2014, at 11:24 AM, Todd Fiala <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > That's totally fine. Usually I see people post patches to lldb-commits > > when they're fairly routine, or post the patch to lldb-dev when there might > > be a lot more discussion about it (i.e. more experimental or exploratory). > > That's my take, anyway. > > > >> There’s some LLDB build breakage visible at least when generating ninja > >> output, under OS X 10.9. > >> > >> I have posted a patch to lldb-commits. Is that the right thing to do? > >> The webpage isn’t quite clear on that. > >> > >> Cheers, Kuba > _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
