I generally sync llvm/clang in the AM, locked, and work with that throughout the day. If I kept up with TOT on all, all day long, I'm pretty sure my work machine, big as it is, would be building all day long ;-)
The only time this has bitten me is when something LLDB depends on changes. Then I fix that or synch to the fix requirement that somebody else made. Are you suggesting something different? -Todd On Tuesday, July 29, 2014, Chandler Carruth <chandl...@google.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Todd Fiala <tfi...@google.com > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tfi...@google.com');>> wrote: > >> A sync on all 3 of llvm, clang and lldb up to r214233 has removed all the >> new errors on Linux and MacOSX. >> > > So, maybe I'm just new no LLDB, but is there *ever* any expectation that > all three repos don't need to be version locked? > > Clang, LLVM, LLD, compiler-rt, etc. are all absolutely version locked. > While things *may* work if you are skewed by a bit, there is no guarantee > and this is an expected failure mode if you take the risk.... > > Is this different in LLDB? > -- Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | tfi...@google.com | 650-943-3180
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
