Thanks. So what I take away from this is that they basically do the same thing, and Process::DoLaunch() can simply call Host::LaunchProcess.
On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 12:30 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <[email protected]> wrote: > Here is a discussion that may give you some answers: > > http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.debugging.lldb.devel/2805 > > For the record, I wrote a process plugin, and end-up not having to > implements the Process:DoLaunch method at all. > On OS X, all processes are launched by the platform which then call > DoAttach. So the Process::DoLaunch code path is never use. > > Le 9 août 2014 à 02:14, Zachary Turner <[email protected]> a écrit : > > > Why are there different code paths for launching a process through these > two methods? Shouldn't there just be one codepath for launching a process? > > > > I've implemented a very primitive process launch for Windows in > ProcessPluginWindows::DoLaunch, but now I'm running into cases where tests > are failing because Host::LaunchProcess isn't implemented yet on Windows. > What do I need to understand about the differences between these two > codepaths to make sure I implement the two correctly? And is there perhaps > a way to refactor some of this code so that all of the process-spawning > code lives in the same place, and the launch args are flexible enough to > support all of the different use cases? > > _______________________________________________ > > lldb-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > >
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
