On the same note, if you have a type Foo and you are frequently going to trade in std::shared_ptr<Foo> across the codebase, it is a convention to typedef std::shared_ptr<Foo> FooSP; and then always trade in FooSPs It is shorter to type, to parse at a glance, and if C++21 ever decided to make a new awesomer smart pointer type, you just redefine the typedef to std::awesome_shared_ptr<Foo> and you’re good to go!
> On Aug 19, 2014, at 10:58 AM, jing...@apple.com wrote: > > We also indicate the the "owning" variables - shared pointer, unique pointer > and the like with _sp, _up and though we don't use them much anymore _ap. Thanks, - Enrico 📩 egranata@.com ☎️ 27683
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
