DeadMG <wolfeinst...@gmail.com> writes: [snip]
> Seeing the feature list seems compelling, but MSVC's actual support is > often still below the standard you can find in GCC or Clang, even in > officially supported features. There's a price to be paid not just in terms > of breaking users who are still VS2012-dependent, but also in terms of > debugging VS2013-only bugs. > > Personally, I think that it's worth upping the minimum requirement whenever > you're not breaking a substantial portion of your userbase. All I'm saying > is, the experience of many of us using VS2013 is that that feature list is > a little ... optimistic. Upgrading on that basis alone may well yield > undesirable results. I second this. My experience with VS is that new features are usually broken if you go beyond the simple cases. And the roadmaps have little credibility, based on a continuous flow of disappointments since... forever. Right now I'm on the process of switching to MinGW-w64. VS 2013 was a no-no on terms of modern C++. [snip] _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
