I believe we have an expression options class that can optionally be passed into expression evaluation. We should extend this class to allow for options to be added to that.
> On Sep 15, 2014, at 5:05 PM, Tong Shen <endlessr...@google.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I think there should be an interface for setting user-defined compiler > options for the JIT compiler. > > For example, executable is compiled with -fno-rtti, but JIT compiler > doesn't set that by default. This difference will cause search failure > of certain rtti objects, which causes an immediate crash (the crash > code is in LLVM, not in LLDB) ... > > What's the preferred way to do this? Here's what I'm thinking: > 1. Add an option to source/Target/Target.cpp > 2. Make ClangExpressionParser honor that option. > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions :-) > > -- > Best Regards, Tong Shen > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev