On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:48 AM, Óscar Fuentes <o...@wanadoo.es> wrote:
> David Chisnall <david.chisn...@cl.cam.ac.uk> writes: > > > <atomic> is trivial, as most of the support is provided by the > > compiler. As of Vista, Windows comes with some quite sane primitives > > for implementing <mutex> and <thread>, so it would only be 1-2 days of > > work for someone to write the implementation for libc++. > > Forcing Clang to depend on libc++ makes things quite complicated for the > end user. For the Windows case, building Clang without cross-compiling > could be impossible, if it requires that libc++ must be compiled by > Clang. The only way Clang would depend on libc++ is if you weren't able or willing to use one of the other host toolchains to cross to windows. Both mingw-w64 and the threads-posix stuff which supports C++11 <thread> would work fine as well.
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
