On Tue, 2014-10-28 at 23:40 -0700, Enrico Granata wrote: > With that said, building LLDB requires building LLVM and clang as > prerequisites. > So there definitely is a clang available if LLDB is being built. > I wonder if one could setup things to bootstrap a clang with gcc, and then > rebuild the entire LLVM, clang, lldb toolset with that built clang. >
Yes, of course that's possible. But I'd argue that just makes things more complex, and less attractive for newcomers to the project. Incidentally, why does lldb require clang to be built as a prerequisite? Given that I can use it to debug a linux binary built with gcc, why do I need to build another compiler along the way? Matt Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom More information can be found at www.csr.com. Keep up to date with CSR on our technical blog, www.csr.com/blog, CSR people blog, www.csr.com/people, YouTube, www.youtube.com/user/CSRplc, Facebook, www.facebook.com/pages/CSR/191038434253534, or follow us on Twitter at www.twitter.com/CSR_plc. New for 2014, you can now access the wide range of products powered by aptX at www.aptx.com. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
