> On Nov 14, 2014, at 10:15 AM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > > Windows doesn't need to do anything special for each thread as it is created. > Only need to update the thread list in the Process object as far as we're > concerned, but that's it. > > The main thing I'm worried about is that the Process object itself runs a > couple of threads in the background (the private state thread, for example), > so I was worried about possible race conditions when modifying state > asynchronously (i.e. from my debugger thread).
What state needs to be updated asynchronously? You shouldn't be touching the thread list (no need to update it, you should be able to update it on demand each time you actually stop right?) at all until you have a valid stop reason and then the process will update the threads itself when and if it needs them. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
