No objections here; it makes sense everything is kept consistent now given the effort with the main codebase.
Cheers, Colin -----Original Message----- From: "d...@burble.org" <d...@burble.org> Sent: 15/11/2014 03:59 To: "Zachary Turner" <ztur...@google.com> Cc: "lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu" <lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu> Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-mi coding style On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 02:53:24AM +0000, Zachary Turner wrote: > You'll probably want to wait for some input from the Apple people and the > Codeplay people before moving forward with reformatting it. However, if the > decision ends up being to move forward with a reformat, then please do it > using clang-format. I have already created a clang format configuration > file in the lldb repository that is pretty close to what the LLDB standard > is, and I would like to see us converge toward that. Yes, we should use clang-format for this. Thanks for the .clang-format file! Apple/Codeplay, any objections from your side? _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev