On 18 November 2014 19:15, Siva Chandra <sivachan...@google.com> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 3:15 PM, <jing...@apple.com> wrote: >> I can see the advantage of this for "casual lldb developers". Are there >> enough of them to warrant putting this in? > > If it is not made official, then there is no onus to maintain it, and > hence would eventually fall out of use and bitrot. > > I take it that you prefer Clang/LLVM changes leading to LLDB breakages > be seen immediately.
Yes. The change in LLDB r164563 is also relevant here, particularly build-llvm.pl. http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?view=revision&revision=164563 > The intent is that fron now on top-of-tree will > always build against LLVM/Clang top-of-tree, and > that problems building will be resolved as they > occur. Stable release branches of LLDB can be > constructed as needed and linked to specific release > branches of LLVM/Clang. -Ed _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
