Python/swig will not be built for Windows using configure yet. That only works through CMake for now and use Python scripts(which refer to finishSwigWrapperClasses) instead of shell scripts for that.
The Python scripts for Python/swig are portable and work on Windows, Linux, possibly OS X too. Thanks, Deepak > On 24 Jan 2015, at 15:48, Eric Christopher <echri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yep. I do it. > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015, 12:12 PM Ted Woodward <ted.woodw...@codeaurora.org > <mailto:ted.woodw...@codeaurora.org>> wrote: > Can LLDB really be built with python/swig using configure? I grepped for > finishSwigWrapperClasses and finish-swig-wrapper-classes in all of llvm + > clang + lldb, but only found references to finishSwigWrapperClasses in the > lldb cmake files. > > > > -- > > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. > > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a > Linux Foundation Collaborative Project > > > > From: lldb-dev-boun...@cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@cs.uiuc.edu> > [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@cs.uiuc.edu>] > On Behalf Of Zachary Turner > Sent: Friday, January 23, 2015 12:58 PM > To: Vince Harron; lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu> > Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] Why do we support both configure and cmake generation? > > > > This is an issue on the LLVM side too. There's a master bug somewhere on the > LLVM side tracking this, but the TL;DR is that CMake doesn't support > everything (particularly when it comes to install) that the configure build > supports. Most of the interested players that I'm aware of have said they > won't mind dropping Make in favor of CMake once those issues are taken care > of. But FWIU they're not easy. > > > > On Fri Jan 23 2015 at 10:50:25 AM Vince Harron <vhar...@google.com > <mailto:vhar...@google.com>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > We're having a problem right now where the buildbot (which uses configure) is > working but we're unable to build locally with cmake. We're investigating > the cmake problem now. > > > > The question is, if we have CMake files (which can generate ninja or make > among others) Why do we still have configure/make? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Vince > > > > > > -- > > > > Vince Harron | > > Technical Lead Manager | > > vhar...@google.com <mailto:vhar...@google.com> | > > 858-442-0868 > > > > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev>_______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu <mailto:lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu> > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev> > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@cs.uiuc.edu http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
